People also ask
What is the difference between agnosticism and strong agnostics?
Thus, an appropriate name for this form of agnosticism is 鈥渟trong agnosticism鈥? Another difference concerns the object of the two forms of agnosticism. The agnosticism in Le Poidevin鈥檚 argument concerned versatile theism versus global atheism.
Why is agnosticism more ambitious than rational permissibility?
This form of agnosticism is more ambitious because knowledge is stronger (in the logical sense) than rational permissibility: it can be rationally permissible to believe propositions that are not known to be true, but a proposition cannot be known to be true by someone who is not rationally permitted to believe it.
What are some of the best books on agnosticism?
Oppy, Graham, 1994, 鈥淲eak Agnosticism Defended鈥? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 36 (3): 147鈥?7. doi:10.1007/BF01316921 Pike, Nelson, 1970, God and Timelessness, New York: Schocken Books. Plantinga, Alvin, 2000, Warranted Christian Belief , Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195131932.001.0001
Is strong agnosticism (about Omni-theism) false?
(5)Strong agnosticism (about omni-theism) is false. Premise (1) was defended in section 6 , premise (4) is true by the definition of 鈥渟trong agnosticism鈥? and steps (3) and (5) follow from earlier steps by modus ponens and modus tollens, respectively.